On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:17:20PM +0100, Mario. wrote: > So, if it is a warning, not an disaster-meaning message, why does it > put the machine to a halt without decelerating down?
It doesn't! Now I'm really puzzled. If the machine is stopping, something else is going on and we need more information. Please report exactly what you see. > And I include rest of the error log files here: > http://kotuha.com/file/116716058850.html Thanks. Based only on the one occurrence shown in your log, I'm pretty satisfied that the error does not represent a real problem. In src/emc/motion/control.c emcmotController() try changing the magic number from 1.1 to 1.2. I've made this change in the cvs head. There is lots of dodgy hardware that's incompatible with realtime. It's an inexact science to determine, using only the information we have inside EMC, what represents a real problem. This test isn't great but it's better than nothing. We knew all along the threshold might have to be tweaked - thanks for reporting this. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
