-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/30/2012 3:17 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> 
> I should make it clear that this is not necessarily a desired
> feature. LinuxCNC real time architecture is a based on a single
> control locus/time domain system with no buffering of real time
> tasks. Anything that compromises this simple model is likely have
> lots of undesired side effects, and for most real controls, the
> current latencies (10->20 Usec is easy with currently avalable
> hardware) better timing is not needed. This is why my suggestions 
> are things that will work with the current timing model.


Thanks!  That clarifies a few things I was wondering about.

No more timing comments from me until I've crawled through more of the
code...  :)

- -- 
Charles Steinkuehler
[email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk92F1EACgkQLywbqEHdNFwfrACg42w3pOsX3rw3JOCiwEDbmIy3
wmAAoKpCE+1Exl8CV4Vd8S2mAjSZtg8d
=mryt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to