On 3/30/2012 3:28 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 3/30/2012 3:17 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> >> I should make it clear that this is not necessarily a desired >> feature. LinuxCNC real time architecture is a based on a single >> control locus/time domain system with no buffering of real time >> tasks. Anything that compromises this simple model is likely have >> lots of undesired side effects, and for most real controls, the >> current latencies (10->20 Usec is easy with currently avalable >> hardware) better timing is not needed. This is why my suggestions >> are things that will work with the current timing model. >> > > Thanks! That clarifies a few things I was wondering about. > > No more timing comments from me until I've crawled through more of the > code... :) > > - -- > Charles Steinkuehler > [email protected] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) >
If you want to see some suffering due to having to deal with Windows in a CNC environment, you should subscribe to the Mach3 email list. It's bad.... A RTOS makes life much easier. :-) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
