A bigger question is will we ever realistically break out HAL as a standalone linkable library? Is it OK with the people working on/playing with HAL that it be used for other projects? My vote would be for the HAL related stuff be LGPL, but that is my 2c/
EBo -- On Mar 10 2013 3:17 PM, Michael Haberler wrote: > I have identified a small piece of code which could take on an > important function in HAL/RTAPI. If it were integrated, it would > become part of the HAL API. > > That code is currently GPL2only. > > The author has expressed willingness to relicense after I told him we > might eventually move to (likely) GPL2+ and pointed to the problem we > would incur if he were unwilling to relicense. > > My question is: what should I ask him: make it LPGPL, GPL2+ or what > else? Please advise. > > - Michael > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The > Forrester > Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in > the > endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner > to > tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
