On 03/10/2013 08:31 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013, at 09:25 PM, EBo wrote:
>> Frankly, I think halscope should either be changed back to to LGPL or
>> simply pulled.
>
> Halscope is a stand-alone application. How does LGPL make sense
> for it?
By the way, 'LGPL' no longer means 'Library GPL', but 'Lesser GPL'. It
can apply to stand-alone applications, so it doesn't necessarily make
'un-sense' for LGPL to apply. :)
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
