David,

I appreciate that well-researched statement, and found it quite enlightening

Am 10.06.2013 um 01:40 schrieb David Bagby <[email protected]>:

> Hi All,
> 
> With some trepidation, I've decided to enter into this conversation.I 
> 
...
> All this leads me to think that worrying about creating a LCNC 
> governance structure to address license issues and/or fretting over the 
> impacts of using GPLvX licensed code with any of the LCNC code that 
> originated from NIST, seems (at least to me) to be a rather fruitless 
> exercise.

Let's not mix up means and ends; I think a credible governance structure is 
needed for coordination of goals and actually reaching them; I dont think such 
a structure is required to address the license issue (it might be on the social 
level - driving things forward in a more coherent and reproducible style)

> Frankly, I'm thinking that a pragmatic approach would be to use a bit 
> more of the "don't worry, be happy" philosophy wrt to licensing and 
> instead steer community effort to improving the CNC Core code.

I wish that were enough.

Practically everbody agrees that "more exposure will aid LinuxCNC". Great, and 
now what?

One obvious tool is to get LinuxCNC into major distribution(s), and that was 
not possible so far but it is becoming an option technically as the sole 
dependency on off-mainstream kernel is removed. 

That raises a new question, which was out of scope so far: 'will the credibly 
communicated license status good enough to get into some of these 
distributions'?

While I personally am not afraid of any legal argument around the current code 
base and license status, I think the answer to that question right now is 
'dubious in the very minimum'.

I think that must remain a prime goal of any such effort to make sense; I could 
care less about a warm cozy feeling about the license status for my own peace 
of mind.

- Michael


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to