> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Morley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 6:46 PM <snip> > Thanks for the comment John. > I understand what you are saying. > But ease of use comes into at some point too. > > I mean if we wanted we could only have one spindle velocity output pin > instead of fwd,rev,rps_out,rpm_out, > spindle_on,brake_on,vel_cmd pins etc. > It would just require the user to add half a dozen components to make > them all work. > > It is just so much simpler HAL code if we cater a bit to common use. > > Chris M >
If such a bundle of pins is useful to most people, why not just create one HAL component that implements them all so that the user has a simpler way to get what he needs, yet the motion control code does not need to be modified in a manner specific to a particular type of machine? Steve Stallings ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
