On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Chris Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:48:47 +0200 > > To: [email protected] > > > I think that in this case the backlash feature is where it belongs. > > > > motion is a loadable HAL module. It is entirely possible to have > > configurations that don't use it (I sometimes do exactly that). There > > probably are things that are in the motion module and shouldn't be, > > but I don't think that this is one. > > > > -- > > atp > > How about adding two pins to motion for each axis. > forward comp and reverse comp. > These would be summed with the compensation that > already comes from the comp file. > Then anyone can tack on any kind of compensation, and it > doesn't break configs. > > Chris M > > This is probably where this is headed. I think a single compensation input would make the most sense in this case, as what we are trying to do is translate from joint position to motor position. This translation should be the same forward and backward. Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
