On Sep 28 2015 8:37 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > On 9/28/15 12:41 AM, Chris Morley wrote: >> Personally I think if we really want this included in linuxcnc in a >> reasonably >> amount of time we should create a 2.8 branch now and then merge >> Joints_Axes >> into master. >> Based on the past, that puts Joints_Axes into the two years + >> position for release. >> >> It seems to me the only way to get it done is to 'force' more >> developers to fix the issues. >> eg I'm not going to fix stepconf or pncconf to work with Joints >> until I know it will be released. >> >> Merge it and lets get it done. > > I think we should merge JA into master before the 2.8 branch. We > just > released 2.7, so this is a fine time for big experimental features. > > But i strongly disagree that we should merge it while it has such > glaring known problems. JA does not not currently work on lathes, or > on > other machines with non-consecutive axes! That's unacceptable in > master, IMO. > > When someone volunteers their time and fixes this bug, it will be > closer > to mergeable. But "forcing" has no place in a volunteer > organization.
non-consecutive axes? I am not aware of that term. I probably know what you mean, but not by that name... EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
