RTAI 5.3 with 4.19.152? That doesn't make sense, the RTAI 5.3.1 release I made 
does a check for a 4.19.195 kernel.

The 4.19.174 kernel works with the dongle but 4.19.152 does not. 4.19.195 will 
have whatever fixes 4.19.174 had and then some.

The 4.19.195 kernel crashes eventually when you do the abs.0 stress test but 
not as much. That part is not fully fixed yet but might be with the 5.4 kernel. 
What I was trying to say is, if you're concerned about LinuxCNC crashing after 
several hundred/thousand runs, then don't bother with it, otherwise if you plan 
to use it normally, it should be just fine. How important is it that the kernel 
crashes after 500 or so LinuxCNC fresh instances, or that the buildbot might 
have some issues here and there? If it is a big concern, then it'd be best to 
wait for 5.4 and give that a shot.

Alec



On Monday, June 21, 2021, 8:12:58 PM UTC, andy pugh <[email protected]> wrote: 



On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 13:34, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that boils down to how important it is that it may crash after 
> several hundred or a few thousand runs.

I don't think that is the question. The existing 4.14.174 kernel
package that we have available also crashes.


> I'd also probably expect a few issues with the build bot as it runs quite a 
> lot of tests in excessive loops but these should go pretty unnoticed on a 
> production system


The approach I have taken with 2.8 is to hand-build a LinuxCNC package
for the supplied RTAI kernel, for those that want it.

I have built an RTAI-5.3 + Linux-image-4.19.152 package (several times
now) but it is no good for my particular machine as my USB Wifi dongle
does not seem to work with it. (Despite the RaLink devices being
enabled in the config)
In fact it seems to not really want to recognise any USB-Wifi dongles
(I have quite a collection)

The same device _does_ work with the 4.14.174-rtai kernel (from last April)


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to