> On 23 Sep 2022, at 9:39 am, Rod Webster <r...@vehiclemods.net.au> wrote: > > I think integrators and users don't want to be continually installing new > versions of Plasmac et al. > Plasmac has only ever existed in the development branch. First a private > fork, then 2.8, then 2.9 > There are updates to it on an almost daily basis. Most of them seem to be > small tweaks that often add seemingly little value.. QtPlasmac is regularly changed as it is in development and only in the development branch.
PlasmaC has only had bug fixes since 2.8 was released > If you throw in the mix that we want to get in step with Debian releases, > the Plasmac developers need to recognise there is a release schedule and > this stream of tweaks has to slow down once 2.9 is the stable branch. We work to any LinuxCNC schedules if any. > I for one would prefer to see the current strategy of only issuing point > releases with bug fixes is retained and enforced across the board so we can > give our users a stable, predictable environment Which is how it currently is... > > Rod Webster > *1300 896 832* > +61 435 765 611 > Vehicle Modifications Network > www.vehiclemods.net.au > > > On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 22:08, Jérémie Tarot <silopo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Le mar. 20 sept. 2022 à 23:04, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>> Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag? >> >> >> Would gladly hear the opinion of the "docs team" chaps about this :) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emc-developers mailing list >> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers >> > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
