Am 25.09.22 um 19:59 schrieb andy pugh:
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 10:57, Hans Unzner<hansunz...@gmail.com> wrote:
On principle a good idea but I think it's misleading if the INI version
number is increased when only something inside a component has changed.
Maybe, but it actually serves no other purpose (and was simply ignored
for about 20 years until I wrote the conversion script for the
joints-axes config changes)
I think that using it to handle pin name changes in a component is
entirely consistent with its current use.
Unfortunately this would not work because:
- From the pin name you can't draw a conclusion on the function.
For example "mb2hal.00.01" could be fnct_06_write_single_register or
fnct_02_read_discrete_inputs. So should be either converted to
"mb2hal.00.01.int" or "mb2hal.00.01.bit".
- The component name could be modified and the transaction names as well.
So "mb2hal.00.01" could be "my_modbus_vfd.read_status.01"
Hans
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
