On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 23:31, Steffen Moeller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de>
wrote:

I consider all our users to be somehow part of our project and am
> agnostic about the interface they are using. From how I see it, if
> PyQtVCP does something better than QtVCP then QtVCP gets some
> encouragement and ideas on how to improve and vice versa. Both GUIs
> should be as easy to install and use as possible.


We already see users getting confused about whether they are using PyVCP
(hand-coded XML input files)
 https://linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/gui/pyvcp.html
Or GladeVCP (more capable, more widgets, has Python handlers. designed
using a GUI (which is horrible, unintiutive and crashes a lot)
https://linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/gui/gladevcp.html

How are integrators (ie, GUI / Panel designers) meant to pick between QtVCP
and the very similarly named QtPyVCP? They do the same thing,
fundamentally.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to