On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 23:31, Steffen Moeller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> wrote:
I consider all our users to be somehow part of our project and am > agnostic about the interface they are using. From how I see it, if > PyQtVCP does something better than QtVCP then QtVCP gets some > encouragement and ideas on how to improve and vice versa. Both GUIs > should be as easy to install and use as possible. We already see users getting confused about whether they are using PyVCP (hand-coded XML input files) https://linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/gui/pyvcp.html Or GladeVCP (more capable, more widgets, has Python handlers. designed using a GUI (which is horrible, unintiutive and crashes a lot) https://linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/gui/gladevcp.html How are integrators (ie, GUI / Panel designers) meant to pick between QtVCP and the very similarly named QtPyVCP? They do the same thing, fundamentally. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers