Because qtpyvcp and qtvcp do the same job using mostly the same tools (python and qt)
If qtpyvcp wanted to be under the linuxcnc unberella they could have continued working in qtvcp instead of making a new independent, project. Nothing wrong with being independent, seems to work for both projects. It is too bad we divided the effort but what is done is done. I'm sure neither project wants their years of work trampled on. Chris Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: Jérémie Tarot <silopo...@gmail.com> Date: 2022-12-01 8:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00) To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Eye candy is important - Titan got a new German friend - want that reaction for a LinuxCNC controller Le jeu. 1 déc. 2022 à 16:47, Small Shop Concepts <lcvet...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I think it would be great if QtPyVCP were included in Linuxcnc. I'm not > sure how you mean it would undermine qtvcp? Isn't Linuxcnc stronger with > more options for users? Further, IIRC @cmorley, you're our UI API uniformization champion, aren't you ? And I support that 1000% ! What could be better on this front than to bring the other modern VCP toolkit to the table ? And another awesome chap like @TurBoss ! > I know JT also has been working on a config builder that is > working really nicely and has added some features making setting up Mesa > very simple and streamlined. > Absolutely ! I already told JT and said here that MesaCT repository surely deserves to join the LinuxCNC organization 👍 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
