I do not disagree with the positions posted on this subject.  My question is
how does the EU interpret and enforce this requirement/definition.

Pryor

----- Original Message -----
From: <david_ster...@ademco.com>
To: <emc-p...@ieee.org>; <gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 2:07 PM
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports


>
>      LAN ports
>      Testing Conducted RF Emissions on LAN twisted-pair lines is almost
>      contrary to the intent of EN 55022 as Gary pointed out.  Conducted
>      emissions is more appropriate for asynchronous analog lines.
>
>      LAN transmissions are digital and synchronous (except maybe ATM); the
>      receiver part of the interface circuitry locks onto the frequency of
>      data, rejecting spurious frequencies. The signals are truely digital,
>      not analog as in a modem.
>
>      Arcnet, Ethernet, and Fast Ethernet TP cabling links two points
(node,
>      hub, switch, bridge) which digitally reconstitute the signal,
>      eliminating spurious cable frequencies.
>
>      Token-Ring is peer-peer, usually through a passive hub.  Each node
>      (peer) reconstitutes the signal as above.
>
>      Ethernet, F-E and Token-Ring ANSI/IEEE or ISO/IEC physical layer
>      requirements define interfaces, cable lengths/type(s) and timing.
>
>      Coax cable rules for Arcnet, 10Base2 Ethernet) permit connection to
>      multiple nodes but again, the digital nature of the signals and the
>      well-defined connectivity rules prevent problems.
>
>      David
>
>
>      ______________________________ Reply Separator
>      _________________________________
> Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> Author:  "Gary McInturff" <SMTP:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com> at
> ADEMCONET
> Date:    9/5/2000 10:54 AM
>
>
>      Define telecom port.
>      A LAN port isn't neccessarily a LAN port. Ethernet ports do not
> connect directly to the Telecommunications network - a necessary condition
> before being a telecommunications port. LANS and MANS operate all of the
> time without any use of any telecommunications equipment. Generally,
> Ethernet or Fast Ethernet for short distances and Gig Ethernet for longer
> distances. IF -- the telecommunications lines are needed there is some
sort
> of "bridge" that takes the ethernet and its digitized Voice over Internet
> Protocol (Voip) and does all of the phone stuff and makes the actual
> metallic connection. That "birdge" has the only telecommunication ports on
> it.
>      Gary
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pryor McGinnis [mailto:c...@prodigy.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 6:24 AM
> To: Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
>
>
>
> Confusing isn't?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pettit, Ghery <ghery.pet...@intel.com>
> To: <david_ster...@ademco.com>; <emc-p...@ieee.org>; <c...@prodigy.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
>
>
> > Actually, it's August 1, 2001 as posted in the OJ on January 25th of
this
> > year.  You've got 1 less month to start testing to the new standard.
> >
> > Ghery Pettit
> > Intel
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: david_ster...@ademco.com [mailto:david_ster...@ademco.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:04 PM
> > To: emc-p...@ieee.org; c...@prodigy.net
> > Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> >
> >
> >
> >      The date of withdrawal of EN 55022:1998 is September 1, 2001.  Look
> at
> >      the NIC manual's DofC --- the mfgr. may not be declaring compliance
> to
> >      conducted emissions yet.
> >
> >
> > ______________________________ Reply Separator
> > _________________________________
> > Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> > Author:  "Pryor McGinnis" <SMTP:c...@prodigy.net> at ADEMCONET
> > Date:    8/30/2000 10:31 AM
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > The question originated from a manufacturer of LAN boards who sells to
end
>
> > users and to manufacturer's who integrate the LAN boards into end
> products.
> >
> > I advised the LAN board manufacturer that conducted emissions would be
> > required (with boards installed in typical host) on all LAN boards sold
to
>
> > end users and manufacturers of products that integrated LAN boards
should
> > test the ports for conducted emission in their end product.  The LAN
board
>
> > manufacturer questioned double testing of the LAN boards.  His concern
is
> > that boards that pass CE  in a typical host may not pass in another
> > manufacturer's end product  (rub of the green).  The LAN Board
> manufacturer
> > ask for second opinions.
> >
> > Many thanks for your answers.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Pryor
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pryor McGinnis [SMTP:c...@prodigy.net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 12:35 PM
> > > To: emc-pstc
> > > Subject: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> > >
> > > Below is a message from a non emc-pstc member.
> > >
> > > If a manufacturer purchases LAN boards which have been tested for
> > > conducted emissions in a host, is the manufacturer required to retest
> the
> > > LAN Ports for conducted emissions if the manufacturer sells his
product
> > with
> > > the LAN board installed?
> > >
> > > I am very interested in your comments.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Pryor McGinnis
> > > c...@prodigy.net <mailto:c...@prodigy.net>
> > > www.ctl-lab.com <http://www.ctl-lab.com>
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> > >
> > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > >      majord...@ieee.org
> > > with the single line:
> > >      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> > >
> > > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > >      Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> > >      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> > >
> > > For policy questions, send mail to:
> > >      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> >      majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line:
> >      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> >      Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> >      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> >      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> >      majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line:
> >      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> >      Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> >      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> >      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
>      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
>      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>
>


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org

Reply via email to