Seems more likely I was. Actually, I have run these tests anyway for
other reasons I just git riled up by a single segment of the community that
imposes restrictions on the rest of the world.
Okay, I just get riled up about a lot of stuff.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Pryor McGinnis [mailto:c...@prodigy.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:37 AM
To: Gary McInturff; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com;
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Reference CISPR 22:1997, Clause 3.5
"telecommunication ports
Ports which are intended to be connected to telecommunication networks (e.g.
public switched telecommunication networks, integrated services digital
networks), local area networks (e.g. Ethernet, Token Ring) and similar
networks."
This definition indicates that LAN boards such as Ethernet & Token Ring will
be treated as telecommunication ports and will require conducted emissions
to be performed as part of the emission testing.
This definition is carried over to EN 55022 and is effective next year.
Am I misinterpreting something here?
Thanks
Pryor
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary McInturff <gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com>
To: 'Pryor McGinnis' <c...@prodigy.net>; Pettit, Ghery
<ghery.pet...@intel.com>; <david_ster...@ademco.com>; <emc-p...@ieee.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 10:54 AM
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> Define telecom port.
> A LAN port isn't neccessarily a LAN port. Ethernet ports do not
> connect directly to the Telecommunications network - a necessary condition
> before being a telecommunications port. LANS and MANS operate all of the
> time without any use of any telecommunications equipment. Generally,
> Ethernet or Fast Ethernet for short distances and Gig Ethernet for longer
> distances. IF -- the telecommunications lines are needed there is some
sort
> of "bridge" that takes the ethernet and its digitized Voice over Internet
> Protocol (Voip) and does all of the phone stuff and makes the actual
> metallic connection. That "birdge" has the only telecommunication ports on
> it.
> Gary
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pryor McGinnis [mailto:c...@prodigy.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 6:24 AM
> To: Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
>
>
>
> Confusing isn't?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pettit, Ghery <ghery.pet...@intel.com>
> To: <david_ster...@ademco.com>; <emc-p...@ieee.org>; <c...@prodigy.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
>
>
> > Actually, it's August 1, 2001 as posted in the OJ on January 25th of
this
> > year. You've got 1 less month to start testing to the new standard.
> >
> > Ghery Pettit
> > Intel
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: david_ster...@ademco.com [mailto:david_ster...@ademco.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:04 PM
> > To: emc-p...@ieee.org; c...@prodigy.net
> > Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> >
> >
> >
> > The date of withdrawal of EN 55022:1998 is September 1, 2001. Look
> at
> > the NIC manual's DofC --- the mfgr. may not be declaring compliance
> to
> > conducted emissions yet.
> >
> >
> > ______________________________ Reply Separator
> > _________________________________
> > Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> > Author: "Pryor McGinnis" <SMTP:c...@prodigy.net> at ADEMCONET
> > Date: 8/30/2000 10:31 AM
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > The question originated from a manufacturer of LAN boards who sells to
end
> > users and to manufacturer's who integrate the LAN boards into end
> products.
> >
> > I advised the LAN board manufacturer that conducted emissions would be
> > required (with boards installed in typical host) on all LAN boards sold
to
> > end users and manufacturers of products that integrated LAN boards
should
> > test the ports for conducted emission in their end product. The LAN
board
> > manufacturer questioned double testing of the LAN boards. His concern
is
> > that boards that pass CE in a typical host may not pass in another
> > manufacturer's end product (rub of the green). The LAN Board
> manufacturer
> > ask for second opinions.
> >
> > Many thanks for your answers.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Pryor
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pryor McGinnis [SMTP:c...@prodigy.net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 12:35 PM
> > > To: emc-pstc
> > > Subject: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
> > >
> > > Below is a message from a non emc-pstc member.
> > >
> > > If a manufacturer purchases LAN boards which have been tested for
> > > conducted emissions in a host, is the manufacturer required to retest
> the
> > > LAN Ports for conducted emissions if the manufacturer sells his
product
> > with
> > > the LAN board installed?
> > >
> > > I am very interested in your comments.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Pryor McGinnis
> > > c...@prodigy.net <mailto:c...@prodigy.net>
> > > www.ctl-lab.com <http://www.ctl-lab.com>
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> > >
> > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > > majord...@ieee.org
> > > with the single line:
> > > unsubscribe emc-pstc
> > >
> > > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > > Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> > > Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> > >
> > > For policy questions, send mail to:
> > > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line:
> > unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> > Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line:
> > unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> > Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
> Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
>
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
