As someone noted recently, the DoC information means something to very few
people
and most don't even care except us homologation people. What's required is good
and what isnt can be good to, depending on the end user.
No one makes/ships the same product thus none will have the same DoC's.
Brians approach may be useful in his product line and business, perhaps
his customers understand the intent and meaning of the DoC.
Most people dont even know or care about the 1000's of labels
on a CRT monitor, or how they got there...But we know the reasons, its our job
to know.
regards,
Richard


From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: DoC Standard Reference and More


> When I list the specific test standards on the DoC, I list them as
EN/IEC61000-XXXXX (for example). I also list the class or level, such as Class
A, Level 3 10V/m, etc..  I also list the environments, such as "For use in
Commercial, Light Industrial, and Heavy Industrial Environments". I try to
include all the information I would like to see on the DoCs I receive.

> So with that said, though the detailed information is not required, there are
many that would appreciate it. I know many out there who would not agree with
this approach.

Brian,

I am one of them. EC Declaration of Conformity is not for the end user, it is
for the
authorities. By including all kind of "unnecessary" information in this legal
document, we may
unintentionally create a situation in which the end user starts demanding more
information to
be included in it. Personally, I do not want to see DoC to be gradually
"converted" to a test
report.

John Radomski
Principal Engineer
Schneider Automation


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas             [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell            [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas             [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell            [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to