In message 
<e6acec5be8405b4e936c9e9bccac10241b6...@bb-corp-be1.corp.cubic.cub>, 
dated Wed, 14 Mar 2007, "Price, Ed" <ed.pr...@cubic.com> writes:

>BTW, does anyone know when component manufacturers started using this 
>tolerance progression? From my own observation, the system was in place 
>for 1930's era design. Was it codified under some old EIA standard, or 
>is it even older?
Radio(tron) Designer's Handbook is usually good for antediluvian 
references, but Chapter 38 doesn't have any before WWII. My recollection 
of examining (cannibalizing) British armed forces equipment after WWII 
is that at the beginning of WWII (TR9 set), preferred value resistors 
were not in use, but they were very soon after the beginning, probably 
as a result of a Ministry of Supply or War Office edict. An article in 
'Wireless World' on the subject certainly gives the impression that the 
principle, anyway, had been adopted in UK before 1939.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to