In message <[email protected]>, dated Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Brian Jones <[email protected]> writes:
>A crucial reason that ENs are required for basic standards is related >to dates of withdrawal. > >Where a basic standard is referenced as an undated reference from a >product family or generic standard, a new edition of the basic standard >would become effective immediately, were it not for the transition >period in the EN basic standard. IEC standards do not have transition >periods. Indeed, although the same effect could be achieved by other means. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
