In message 
<768ee6ab7d56d54bb5000ec2dd113e71018db...@de01exm61.ds.mot.com>, dated 
Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Leber Jody-G19980 <jody.le...@motorola.com> writes:

>EN 61000-4-2 does not appear to be in the standards list for the EMC 
>Directive.  However, CENELEC's website indicates that it is in the OJ 
>and even provides dates. 

I think that's technically known as a 'mistake'.

>I was under the assumption that EN 61000-4-2 was not in the OJ but 
>referenced in a product specific immunity standard such as EN 55024 if 
>required.

Indeed: Basic standards are not notified under the EMC Directive.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to