In message <cfb6c0b6.1eed7%scott...@gmail.com>, dated Fri, 6 Jun 2014,
Scott Xe <scott...@gmail.com> writes:
Is there any reason behind to have LVD, EMC and R&TTE directives
updated in similar time? On R&TTE, the changes are quite significant.
There are more than those being updated. This is for complicated legal
reasons, and in some cases the Commission has found that the Directives
were not effective in keeping non-compliant products out of the EU.
But the change to the RTTED is special. Its scope was found to need
revising because it included some products that it shouldn't, but
excluded some products, such as broadcast receivers, that it should
include.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
