On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:49:58 +0800, Scott Xe <scott...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason behind to have LVD, EMC and R&TTE directives updated in > similar time? To align them with NLF, all the new approach directives which were not aligned with NLF were/will be updated even if no other changes were necessary. For some directives such as R&TTED (RED), other significant changes were also made. NLF itself have big impact, and I guess own brand labelers who supplied completed product from OEMs may have hard time. Regards, Tom - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
