Hi Scott,

It looks to me as if the 3rd party overlooked the DoW, and you are
right, a warning, possibly with a re-inspection in 2016 seems more
appropriate.
But it all depends on the the compliance systems in force in the place
this happened.
Do you want to share the standard (old/new) , the clause and country
(EC,USA, elsewhere) with us ?


Gert


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
Sent: donderdag 31 juli 2014 19:22
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Definition of unsafe product

Recently we received a sales ban from an authority.  The authority took
a sample from the market and appointed a 3rd party laboratory for
verification of LVD conformity.  They found a non conformance on
construction according to the latest version of safety standard and
concluded the product is unsafe.  The requirement is new in the latest
version and did not appear in the previous version.

When our product was verified by the 3rd party test house, it complied
with previous version of safety standard but was the latest version of
the safety standard at time of testing.  The new version was issued 2
months later and has an additional construction requirement.  The DoW of
previous version of safety standard is in 2016.  We are at loss how come
they consider our product unsafe with the latest version of the standard
during this transitional period.  Any previous experience to deal with
such authority can be shared?  It sounds ridiculous charge on our
product.

Thanks and regards,

Scott

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site
at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to