In message <8fe0b56b86c54b74ba5b760e33552...@thhste15d1be4.hs20.net>,
dated Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Charlie Blackham <char...@sulisconsultants.com>
writes:
The last scenario is the ?nasty? one ? there is a transition period
written into RED, but not into EMC or LVD, so equipment that is
currently R&TTE, but not RED has to, in theory, comply with EMC/LVD
?overnight?
It's not the only nasty one. The absence of a low-frequency bound in the
RED means that some products become subject to **as-yet non-existent
emission and immunity requirements** from June next year, not June 2017.
Not only are there no requirements, there are no established test
methods.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
