A clamp-on ferrite with a few turns of wire and connected to a spectrum
analyzer, worked out to be a good tool for measuring CM currents on single
cables. It gave me some measured numbers [dBuV], and then I worked on trying
to get the numbers down :)

But when I placed the home-made probe on wires / cables inside a noisy rack,
problems started. The probe picked up almost all kinds of frequencies, even
when no cables or wires where going through the probe (ferrite). 

 

This lesson told me that a simple home-made current probe works good on a
stand-alone cable, but it does not work that good then measurements are
carried out closed to other noisy sources.  Then you might need a more
professional current clamp.

 

#Amund

 

 

 

 

 

Fra: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] 
Sendt: 15. januar 2016 17:53
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Emne: Re: [PSES] Fwd: [PSES] Current probe for CM currents

 

I think it is important to not lose sight of the original query that started
this thread. The query was about whether placing a current probe around a
cable perturbed the current to be measured. 

There is no doubt that radiated emissions can originate within an equipment
enclosure separately from driving common mode currents on a cable, but that
wasn't the query. In fact, the poster was probing cables within a large rack
(enclosure) looking for a source within an enclosure.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261



  _____  

From: Bill Owsley <000000f5a03f18eb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org
<mailto:000000f5a03f18eb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> >
Reply-To: Bill Owsley <wdows...@yahoo.com <mailto:wdows...@yahoo.com> >
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:26:08 +0000
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> >
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fwd: [PSES] Current probe for CM currents

If you can measure common mode noise on a cable, you have a problem from the
port !!
Note the world famous Ott's math on this effect in his 1st edition.  Might
be in his 2nd too.

I have used both e-field and h-field (current clamp) at the same time.
We are engineers so figure out how I did that!
And since some of the work is below 30 MHz, I have also added a loop antenna
for a 3rd measurement.
My approach is if I find any emission, locally, near field, bench stuff,
that varies by position over the area of the product, then I have a problem.
E-field scan,using a o'scope probe.  H-field scan usually using a personally
built small loop, and any other sort of scan, conducted or radiated, that I
can make up at the moment.
I work for a homogeneous field in the scans over the area of the product.
My assumption is that if I find a homogeneous field, then there are no or
low emission gradients which can equate to a field at a distance.  So get
creative, and redundant, by different methods for measuring the emissions.
Ironic, I am good at mashing all emissions, and then they hand me an
intentional radiator and ask that I don't kill the fundamental.  What ?  You
mean I have to pick what to mash, and what not to mash?  
Ok, so I caught on quick enough to keep the job.  


ps. I suffer from not being able to use a leaky enclosure.  I don't get any
shielding for the products.
Cable shielding that is bogus terminated, but at the low frequencies of
interests, it works.  
Then I have to deal with the higher frequencies, the harmonics !!!
Plastic covers and pcb and cables up to 15 KW or more of digital BS to make
an analog signal.
And then 'normal' digital signals for the ADC circuits all in the middle of
this.
Management is like, we have done it this way for over 25 years and so we are
not changing it now.  
It works (I have to make it work) so don't change anything.  Sucks to be me
- but I do like a challenge.




 


 


 
 
  


  _____  


From: Ken Wyatt <k...@emc-seminars.com <mailto:k...@emc-seminars.com> >

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to