I have no definite answer either but a few suggestions….
                
*       To prevent RF current to flow away (re-radiate) from the test setup 
though the capacitance between cable and clamp. Necessary of the generator is 
"remote".
*       The opposite: get rid of common mode voltages on the generator 
(=amplifier) output that might couple in on the cable under test

There is probably not a real reason, but the decision was  part of was thought 
to be good craftsmanship.


Regards,

Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
+ Compliance Testing and Design for CE marking
     according to EC-directives:
        - Electro Magnetic Compatibility 2004/108/EC
        - Electrical Safety 2006/95/EC
        - Medical Devices 93/42/EC
        - Radio & Telecommunication Terminal Equipment 99/5/EC
+ Improvement of Product Quality and Reliability testing
+ Education

Web:    www.cetest.nl (English) 
Phone :  +31 10 415 24 26
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments thereto may contain information 
that is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights 
and are intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above. 
Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not 
limited to, total or partial reproduction, communication or 
distribution in any form) by persons other than the designated 
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify the sender either by telephone or by e-mail and 
delete the material from any computer. 
Thank you for your co-operation.

From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] 
Sent: Friday 11 November 2016 04:28
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Bulk Current Injection

Does anyone on this forum know why the current injection clamp must be 
grounded? I can’t think of a reason for that.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261

________________________________________
From: "Kunde, Brian" <brian_ku...@lecotc.com>
Reply-To: "Kunde, Brian" <brian_ku...@lecotc.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:22:39 +0000
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Conversation: [PSES] Bulk Current Injection
Subject: Re: [PSES] Bulk Current Injection

Three things to keep in mind with the 61000-4-6 Conducted Immunity test when 
using clamps;
 
1.      There two types of clamps; The Current Clamp which must be grounded via 
the BNC connector and a short strap to the Reference Ground Plane, and The EM 
clamp which most commercially available models have grounding pads on the 
bottom which touches the Reference ground plane; so with these the ground strap 
is not needed. 


2.      The entire Test Setup must not be directly grounded to Earth or the 
Ground Reference Plane. The entire EUT is slightly floating off of ground 
through the impedance created by the CDNs and placed on 10cm platforms above 
the GRP.


3.      There must always be at least TWO coupling devices in the test setup 
(see reason below).  You must provide a loop or return path for the energy you 
are injecting.

If you are testing an EUT with no I/O and only one port with a CDN attached, 
then you must add a second CDN (CDN-M1) to the chassis ground of the EUT to the 
Ground Plane. If the EUT has a dedicated ground earth terminal, you can connect 
a CDN-M1 from it to the Ground Plane. 

If the EUT does not have a ground (Class 2 device or all plastic chassis) then 
you can wrap the EUT in aluminum foil and connect it to the ground plane via a 
CDN-M1. 

The only setup picture in the standard that really shows this configuration in 
Figure F.2. Note without the CDN-M1 the EUT would only have one CDN attached. 
Like I said before; you must have at least two CDN devices in the test setup. 



It would be most difficult to do in an In-Situ setup for the 4-6 test. If you 
cannot keep the EUT from shorting directly to ground, either directly or 
through one of the EUTs, then you cannot do the test. The Standard does not 
give a test setup for in-situ testing. 


See section 7.7 when using a clamp where you cannot met the common mode 
impedance requirements:
 
“When using clamp injection, and the common mode impedance requirements cannot 
be met
at the AE side, it is necessary that the common mode impedance of the AE be 
less than or
equal to the common mode impedance of the EUT port being tested. If not, 
measures shall be
taken (e.g. by using a CDN-M1 or 150 􀀺 resistor from the AE to ground) at the 
AE port to
satisfy this condition and to prevent resonances”
 
I hope this was helpful.
The Other Brian
 
 
 
 

From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 10:14 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Bulk Current Injection

Are you using the 2013 edition of IEC 61000-4-6?  It's certainly a bit 
confusing. Figure 5 shows the strap without any qualification about its use, 
but Figure 14 says 'if needed'. 
 

With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/>  J M Woodgate and 
Associates Rayleigh England
 
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
 

From: David [mailto:000000fdec74198b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:14 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Bulk Current Injection


All,

 

I’m trying to learn more about Bulk current injection. I’ve read Javor’s Field 
to Wire Coupling papers, as well as -4-6, ISO 11452-4, SAE J1113-4, and CS114.

 

I’m primarily interested in grounding, and the differences between -4-6 and the 
rest. 

 

-4-6 requires that the injection probe or clamp is grounded with a short ground 
strap. MIL STD, ISO, and SAE don’t do so. I would assume it’s due to the 
difference between a test simulating commercial AC powered equipment versus 
vehicle mounted equipment. I’d like a more thorough understanding of why. 

 

Also, if I do not ground the BCI probe during -4-6, say during an in situ test 
on an elevated cable, what would the result be? An under test, over test, or 
unknown? For large equipment would it make sense to tie it to the chassis?

 

David
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 
________________________________________
LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential 
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by 
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to