Dear Scott,

The "National Differences" refer to particular requirements for a country or a 
group of counties (i.e. EU) included in an IEC standard when the standard is 
adopted by these county or group of countries. The ND need to be public 
declared in the IECEE site by the NCBs part of CB Scheme. These ND up-date the 
standard requirements accordingly. You are correct by specifying " If the 
applicant indicates the destined market, the testing house cannot avoid the 
testing to national differences and deviations" and for this reason the test 
report need to refer to the specific standards from the indicated country or 
group of countries. Sometime the testing houses not cover in the correct way 
the specified ND or not refer as needs to the local standards. If the applicant 
do not specify the target markets for his product, the testing houses provide 
the test report only according to IEC (the case of CB Scheme).
Best Regards,
Steli


Steli Loznen, M.Sc., SM-IEEE
Member of BoD IEEE-PSES
Convener IEC 62A/MT 62354
17-3 Shaul HaMelech Blvd.
Tel Aviv 6436719
Israel
Tel:+972-3-6912668
Fax:+972-3-6913988
Mobile:+972-54-7245794
e-mail: sloz...@ieee.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 2:49 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonized standard withdrawn

Dear Steli,

Thanks for your advice!  Do National Differences mean National conditions and 
National deviations normally in Annex of the standard?

How can a testing house ignore the National Differences?   I dare to guest the 
applicants may not decide where the goods to be sold when applies for the 
testing.  Thus the testing house either does not test the national differences 
or test all national differences.  As a commercial testing house, testing them 
all will increase the testing charges reducing their competitive edge on the 
market.  If the applicant indicates the destined market, the testing house 
cannot avoid the testing to national differences and deviations.  The buyer 
must be careful to accept the supplier’s evidence when they receive those 
testing report and see if it fits for purpose.

Regards,

Scott



On 22/7/2017, 6:01 PM, "Steli Loznen" <rshap...@post.tau.ac.il> wrote:

    Dear Scott,
    In addition to the Mr. Woodgate comment, please be informed that in the 
frame of the CB Scheme need to pay attention to "National Differences" on IEC 
standards. This is an important issue which not all time is addressed by the 
testing houses which issue the CB Test Reports.
    Best Regards,
    Steli
    
    
    
    Steli Loznen, M.Sc., SM-IEEE
    Member of BoG IEEE-PSES
    Convener IEC 62A/MT 62354
    17-3 Shaul HaMelech Blvd.
    Tel Aviv 6436719
    Israel
    Tel:+972-3-6912668
    Fax:+972-3-6913988
    Mobile:+972-54-7245794
    e-mail: sloz...@ieee.org
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
    Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:54 AM
    To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
    Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
    
    Dear John,
    
    It is a good point to note!
    
    Thanks and regards,
    
    Scott
    
    
    On 22/7/2017, 4:37 PM, "John Woodgate" <jmw1...@btinternet.com> wrote:
    
        The EN and the IEC are *never* identical, especially now that the ENs 
have to include a succession of 'Z' annexes. Large parts of the technical 
content may well be identical, but the ENs include a lot of European 'baggage', 
which can't safely be ignored. 
        
        With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
        www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
        
        Sylvae in aeternum manent.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
        Sent: 22 July 2017 09:13
        To: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>
        Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
        
        Hi John,
        
        I notice the CB reports that they will conduct the test according to 
IEC standard and the standards for destined market, i.e. EN for EU.  As usual, 
EN standards are derived from IEC standard.  If the IEC standard is listed 
below the EN standard without indication of modified, the IEC compliance report 
can be used as self-declaration of conformity to the directive due to the fact 
that both EN and IEC standards are identical.
        
        Regards,
        
        Scott
        
        
        On 22/7/2017, 2:24 PM, "John Woodgate" <jmw1...@btinternet.com> wrote:
        
            That isn't a 'listing' of the IEC standards, it's an indication of 
what the EN was derived from. You can see that, because some of the IEC 
standards are described as '(modified)'.
            
            With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
            www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
            
            Sylvae in aeternum manent.
            
            -----Original Message-----
            From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
            Sent: 22 July 2017 03:53
            To: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>; 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
            Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
            
            Dear John,
            
            The attached HS list does have IEC standards.  Do they have other 
meaning that I might incorrectly interpret it?
            
            Thanks and regards,
            
            Scott
            
            
            On 22/7/2017, 1:08 AM, "John Woodgate" <jmw1...@btinternet.com> 
wrote:
            
                IEC standards are rarely, if ever, notified in the OJ, because 
they are not harmonized so all EU/CENELEC  countries do not have to accept them.
                
                With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
                www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh 
England
                
                Sylvae in aeternum manent.
                
                -----Original Message-----
                From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
                Sent: 21 July 2017 17:50
                To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
                Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
                
                Hi Durrer,
                
                Both IEC and EN 60335-2-24 were in the harmonised standard list 
of OJEU before they were removed.  Regarding the national standard BS EN 
60335-2-24 should be technically identical with EN 60335-2-24.  Although it is 
still valid in BSI website, the HS removal is due to UK objection.  It does not 
make sense using BS EN 60335-2-24 to declare the compliance with LVD.
                
                It is good suggestion to take care this known issue in risk 
assessment required in LVD.  As this issue is being discussed in IEC to EN 
standard conversion.  For the time being, the latest IEC A2 amendment seems a 
reasonable reference to address the fire risk.
                
                Regards,
                
                Scott
                
                
                On 21/7/2017, 4:16 PM, "Dürrer Bernd" <bernd.duer...@wilo.com> 
wrote:
                
                    Dear Scott,
                    
                    The removal of the reference to EN 60335-2-24 from the OJEU 
means that compliance with this standard does not provide the presumption of 
conformity as defined in Article 12 of LVD. Actually, the nationally adopted 
versions of this standard are still valid (e.g. BS EN 60335-2-24, 
https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030236214). As IEC 
60335-2-24 is not listed as an international standard in the OJEU, I do not see 
any advantage in declaring CE compliance with the IEC version, especially as 
the objection raised by the UK against the use of highly flammable materials 
would also apply to fridges compliant with IEC 60335-2-24.
                    
                    As risk analysis (preferably according to CENELEC Guide 32) 
is a mandatory part of the technical documentation (LVD, Annex III, Module A, 
2.), the manufacturer is bound to consider the findings in UK's objection and 
to avoid the use of such materials even if they are compliant with the IEC/EN 
standard. Please be aware that the obligations of the manufacturer (LVD, Art. 
6) also include the monitoring of products already in the market and to take 
corrective measures if it is found that a product presents a risk.
                    
                    Regarding a new product, you may still refer to EN 
60335-2-24, but it will not give you presumption of conformity. With the CE DoC 
you declare that your electrical equipment provides "a high level of protection 
of health and safety of persons, and of domestic animals and property" (LVD, 
Art. 1), using the standard as a technical means to demonstrate compliance, but 
considering also risks that are not adequately addressed in the standard.
                    
                    Kind regards,
                    
                    Bernd
                    
                    Von: Wiseman, Josh UTC CCS 
[mailto:joshua.e.wise...@carrier.utc.com]
                    Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2017 21:31
                    An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
                    Betreff: Re: [PSES] Harmonised standard withdrawn
                    
                    Scott,
                    
                    You can continue to use EN 60335-1 and reference IEC 
60335-2-24 to show compliance.  Just because the EN is withdrawn doesn’t mean 
the IEC is no longer valid.  Knowing now about the plastic issue, maybe you do 
some other evaluation method for it to ensure it’s safe to be used in that 
application.
                    
                    Josh Wiseman
                    Senior Compliance Engineer
                    
                    Taylor Company
                    Joshua Wiseman
                    Senior Compliance Engineer
                    750 N. Blackhawk Blvd. | Rockton, IL 61072
                    Office: 815.624.5628 | Cell: 815.262.5517 | Fax: 
815.624.5181
                    http://www.taylor-company.com/ | 
https://twitter.com/TheTaylorCo | http://www.youtube.com/TheTaylorCompany
                    -----------------------------------------------
                    This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, use or circulate this 
message. Instead, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this 
message and then delete it from your system.  Internet communications are not 
secure. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this 
communication has not been tampered with, Taylor Company cannot be responsible 
for alterations made to the contents of this message without its express 
consent, and Taylor Company accepts no responsibility for changes to or 
interception of this message after it was sent or for any damage to the 
recipient's systems or data caused by this message or its attachments. 
Opinions, conclusions and other information contained  in this message that do 
not relate to the official business of Taylor Company shall be understood as 
neither given n  or e  ndorsed by Taylor Co mpany. Please also note that 
messages to or from Taylor Company may be monitored to ensure compliance with 
Taylor Company policies and standards and to protect our business.
                    -----------------------------------------------
                    
                    From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
                    Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 9:38 AM
                    To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
                    Subject: [External] [PSES] Harmonised standard withdrawn
                    
                    The harmonised standard EN 60335-2-24 is removed from the 
harmonised standard list on OJEU.  The common compliance route of 
self-declaration of conformity to LVD using harmonised standard becomes lost.  
What are other options to demonstrating the compliance with LVD?
                    
                    Thanks and regards,
                    
                    Scott
                    -
                    
----------------------------------------------------------------
                    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>
                    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the 
web at: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_emc-2Dpstc.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=VIRQq3ILdGSf6dvMzNp5OWiCAeSuh8Ssf9WYmfhEpz0&e=
                    Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__product-2Dcompliance.oc.ieee.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=3zDWGtj2JcDcnfAvvRC9oYVUDo7raetrj4p-ATYjkJ0&e=
 can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                    Website: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=9w0yYDC69Ng_SmSEIaEmWhzThHwIfwGAhDPAow8jUyY&e=
                    Instructions: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_list.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=_tfBUhxNcZTrOJohdxg3nlXk7j3uL6EehFkkkYcxflA&e=
                    List rules: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_listrules.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=-uUeSArkKHSGt0s1-cu4EGS5VC9rX49ocK0RqXkb6Sw&e=
                    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                    Scott Douglas <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>
                    Mike Cantwell <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>
                    For policy questions, send mail to:
                    Jim Bacher <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
                    David Heald <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>
                    -
                    
----------------------------------------------------------------
                    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>
                    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the 
web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
                    Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                    Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
                    Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
                    List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
                    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                    Scott Douglas <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>
                    Mike Cantwell <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>
                    For policy questions, send mail to:
                    Jim Bacher <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
                    David Heald <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>
                    
                    ________________________________
                    
                    
                    WILO SE
                    Nortkirchenstrasse 100, 44263 Dortmund
                    Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 21356
                    www.wilo.com
                    
                    Vorstand/Executive Board:
                    Oliver Hermes (Vorsitzender/Chairman), Dr. Markus 
Beukenberg, Carsten Krumm, Eric Lachambre, Mathias Weyers
                    Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender/Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
                    Prof. Dr. Norbert Wieselhuber
                    
                    Dieses Dokument ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Die 
Weitergabe sowie Vervielfaeltigung, Verwertung und Mitteilung seines Inhalts 
ist nur mit unserer ausdruecklichen Genehmigung gestattet. Alle Rechte 
vorbehalten, insbesondere fuer den Fall der Schutzrechtsanmeldung.
                    
                    This document has to be treated confidentially. Its 
contents are not to be passed on, duplicated, exploited or disclosed without 
our expressed permission. All rights reserved, especially the right to apply 
for protective rights.
                    
                    -
                    
----------------------------------------------------------------
                    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
                    
                    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the 
web at:
                    http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
                    
                    Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                    
                    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
                    Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html 
(including how to unsubscribe)
                    List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
                    
                    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                    Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
                    Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
                    
                    For policy questions, send mail to:
                    Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
                    David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
                    
                
                -
                ----------------------------------------------------------------
                This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
                
                All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
                http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
                
                Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                
                Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
                Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including 
how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
                
                For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
                Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
                
                For policy questions, send mail to:
                Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
                David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
                
                
            
            
            
        
        
        
        
    
    -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
    
    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
    
    Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
    
    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
    Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
    
    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
    Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
    
    For policy questions, send mail to:
    Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
    David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
    
    

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to