On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:14:26 +1000, you wrote: >On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:50:37PM +0100, robert wrote: >> >> steve as said already if F word is really a issue for you change the >> source code recompile job done. > >Since a locally customised emc interpreter would need to be patched on >each release, unless the enhancement is adopted by the distribution, it >might be more convenient to put the gcode through a preprocessor before >emc sees it.
Hi Erik - I've already fell foul of that one with Les Newall's "jog during toolchange" fix ;) >I've just put together a skeleton gcode preprocessor, with conversion of >'F' to 'K' on only G33 commands. If steve would like to try it, I'll >shoot it across, rather than clutter the list with it, even though the >initial one-trick implementation is only 52 lines, plus 22 lines of >usage example. It's a very kind offer, but basically what I've done using Cimco Edit. Steve Blackmore -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
