I have to say that pretty much every machine I have ever worked on (I do quite a bit of repair work) that had an override used a pot, giving an absolute position. I don't think I have seen one with an incremental control for the overrides.
Les John Kasunich wrote: > The NIST/EMC way of doing things doesn't just apply to pendant controls > vs GUI controls. It is a general principle for any time there can be > more > than one source of control. For example, a large machine, especially > something like a horizontal boring machine, might have two (or more) > sets of jogwheels and buttons, one on each side of the table, for the > convenience of the operator. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
