Vericut comes close to what Chris proposes with their solid simulation.
There are other solid simulations available. It would be an interesting
investigation.

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Chris Radek <ch...@timeguy.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:36:57PM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
> > What additional info would be required to know what I was asking about.
> > Or is it more "Oh no dude, we know what you wanted, it's just so not
> > possible, we just don't want to touch this one" :>
>
> I agree it'd be nice if the machine could somehow avoid crashing,
> but the problem is not straightforward.
>
> My lathe has a horizontal turret but no tailstock.  Soft limits keep
> the turret itself from striking the spindle nose.  If I mount the 3
> jaw chuck, it would be possible to make a different soft limit
> setting to keep the turret from striking the chuck.
>
> But this really doesn't help much at all.
>
> The turret can strike the workpiece, or the chuck jaws which stick
> out different distances depending on how far they are open.
>
> A tool (which sticks out from the turret in various directions) can
> strike anything.  Even if the tool table would have per-tool soft
> limits, on my lathe with an octagonal turret, adjacent tools can
> easily hit stuff too.
>
> Frankly I just don't see how what you ask is possible.  A simple
> (but perhaps not easy) implementation such as different soft limits
> per tool seems inadequate for lots of reasons.  An adequate
> implementation (like modeling the whole turret and all its tools,
> and the spindle nose and the chuck and the workpiece) and having EMC
> monitor those shapes for interference with one another would probably
> be so complex to use (development aside) that nobody would use it.
>
> Like you hint at, I suspect everyone knows what you want to happen -
> the machine stops and gives an error instead of crashing.  But what we
> need instead is a specification that would allow this to be
> implemented (and then someone able and interested in doing it).
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>



-- 
dos centavos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to