Independent inspection/QC is where the rubber meets the road. ;-)

Dave

On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:08 +0300, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2010/9/28 Igor Chudov <ichu...@gmail.com>:
> > I agree with Jon, the guy is so optimistic that it is ridiculous.
> > Especially since he has not even started retrofitting the controls.
> 
> 2010/9/28 dave <dengv...@charter.net>:
> > Well, he seems to have $$ to burn but doing a reality check with Stuart
> > might be helpful. Apparently he has sunk 5 to 10 E 6 into it. Wonder
> > what he is smoking?? ;-)
> 
> The guy is from microsoft. That explains everything to me - both
> unrealistic approach and the serious cash amounts that are attracted
> to this venture. And that is also a reason, why I will not wonder, if
> the investment will never be recovered.
> 
> Przemek suggested that somebody should introduce that guy to EMC. I
> have a personal belief that he will not give up on using Windows, so
> the casino box - Mach3 - is his most likely choice :))
> 
> Well, I think that there is one thing that he has done properly - PR.
> Obviously, experience from his previous work, how to get high PR on a
> low product.
> 
> /vie
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to