Stuart, long ago when we figured out how to set the scaling, you wrote this:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:32:31PM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote: > Hi, > I checked the DAC output - it was .889 - I changed the scale from 8.89 to > .889 - the response was back to just like before. > The config files to match this picture are available > The latest picture is; > http://www.mpm1.com:8080/machines/enshu/Screenshot-1.png Unfortunately this picture is gone, but I remember it looking *really* good and I commented on it. It was within a few encoder counts on a rapid. What happened since then? It seems like you had a major regression of some kind. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
