On 2/8/2011 11:13 AM, Kyle Kerr wrote: > I know I have missed out on the list for a good long time, but, I > thought I recalled that usb read/writes were the worst thing one could > try to do while using EMC2. I realize that it was done as stress > testing. I just thought those read/writes were pretty much suggested > to be avoided as they absolutely killed a systems performance. Please, > re-educate me if I am wrong. > > Kyle Kyle:
I wish I had time to explore this subject more thoroughly. For example, in the past I've noticed anomalous timings that I suspected were the result of using a USB mouse on a particular board but didn't have time to prove or disprove the hypothesis. As for my "stress" test, it was anything but scientific, but the fact that the latency numbers for this MB were decent even with USB-disk access encouraged me. Regards, Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
