On 11.09.11 13:34, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> I wouldn't fret about the age of mailfilter. Version 0.8.2 is just 2
> years old.
True, occasionally old software is static because it doesn't need
improving. I've never used mailfilter, but have relied on procmail for
all my mail filtering for many years now, and although v3.22 was a
decade old two days ago, I have no reason to change. It works like a
bought one, and the mailing list is quite active, which is all that
matters.
Admittedly, spam is so sparse here that I just maintain a manual
blacklist. If it were a problem, I'd look at spamassassin and its ilk,
I think. It is both unix and KISS to let one tool do one thing, and do
it well.
Erik
(Posting mostly to see if a highly positive TZ is troublesome.)
--
(5) It is always possible to agglutinate multiple separate problems
into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases
this is a bad idea.
RFC-1925
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
