Erik,
here is link for your reference that illustrates the whole concept quite
neatly. If you look at the 2 stage filter in the middle picture you will see
a common-mode core combined with 2 seperate cores, to filter out 2 different
kinds of interference.
Also the matter of proper wiring is illustrated in the bottom pic.

http://www.emcuk.co.uk/awareness/Pages/MitigationTechniques/Design/Filtering.htm

Regards,

j.


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Erik Christiansen
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On 16.10.11 10:50, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> > I happened to have the filter left over from another project, and got to
> > thinking, in a pinch, it would be nice to be able to make one up from
> > typical junk bin parts. If anyone can shed light on this, I'd appreciate
> > it. I noticed some small filters (power cord socket / switch / filter
> > unit) on some junk telecomm equipment I have, that may be a good source
> > for filters too. (Also old PC power supplies?)
>
> Those in my junkbox, including one built into an IEC mains socket, have
> a full circuit diagram on one side. Before I forget, the capacitors
> connected across the line must be approved for the role, i.e. be proper
> "X" or "Y" denominated capacitors. (I think the category includes
> self-healing dielectric, but definitely indicates they're low
> flammability, and won't spontaneously exude their guts like a non-X
> capacitor I found in this role, in some cheap equipment. Fortunately it
> didn't catch fire, but the fumes corroded adjacent exposed metal. I
> wouldn't want to breathe that.)
>
> The "core" of the filter is usually a common-mode choke, i.e. two
> windings on one ferrite core. We've probably all seen them on the input
> or output of a SMPS, with two diametrically opposite quadrants of the
> core carrying maybe a dozen turns of fairly thick wire. (At low voltage
> anyway.) An "X" capacitor across the inductor ends connected to line
> provides the input leg of what is a balanced pi filter, and two "Y"
> capacitors are connected in series across the load ends of the
> inductors. A resistor across the load discharges all the capacitors, so
> you don't suddenly drop the thing on your foot, after accidentally
> touching the input or output leads.
>
> OK, those capacitors are a bit fat, but here's an ascii art depiction:
>
>                                         *
>         --------------------@@@@@@@@@@@---------------------
>                  |                         |      |
>                  |          XXXXXXXXXXX    |     --- Y
>                  |          X              %     ---
>  LINE   ___     --- X       X Common       % R    |___ Earth     LOAD
>           |     ---         X Core.        %      |
>           |      |          X              %     --- Y
>        Earth     |          XXXXXXXXXXX    |     ---
>                  |                         |      |
>         --------------------@@@@@@@@@@@---------------------
>                           *
>
> The coils are connected straight through, but counterwound, i.e. one
> side is CW, the other CCW wound, in the several I've just fished out of
> the junkbox, so I'd draw the phasing dots as above. That seems
> consistent with the intended rejection of common-mode signals, so I
> think I have that right.
>
> The "6ET1" 6A,120/250v 50-60Hz line filter in front of me uses:
>
>   L = 18.5 mH  (Per leg, I figure)
>   X = 47 uF    (X2 type)
>   Y = 4 nF     (Y type), 2 off
>   R = 330 kOhms
>
> That's about all I can think of, off the top of my head. It should be
> nearly enough to start with. The commercial jobs are built in a
> shielding enclosure, but the open ones on SMPSs do a lot of good too.
>
> You could just use separate inductors, and coils wound on straight
> ferrite rods have also been used, but they're, not as good.
>
> Erik
>
> --
> In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
> and much more difficult to find."                  - Terry Pratchett
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to