Jon,
I think Richards original message was a little ironical. I think was he 
meant was that this EMC2 list is moving towards commercial users more 
and more, who are making money by using a no cost control program 
system. Consequently, interests of hobbyists (like I am, too) are going 
to the background. Nobody seriously wants to make watches on the kitchen 
table, you can buy them for a few dollars.

The machine Richard is actually looking for is the UWG, a combined, 
extremely versatile table top lathe-mill-grinding machine with 
extraordinary precision (1/100 mm easily) made by the Hommel factory 
here in Germany from WW II times until about 1970. Since then, those 
machines have been dealt in ebay and other shops for tremendous prices, 
even spare parts are paid for by their weight in gold (almost). Call 
www.ebay.de and look for "Hommel UWG", right now there a sale is going 
on. Google for "Hommel UWG" and you will get a lot of hits, also from 
the UK. Besides, UWG is an acronym for "Universelles Werkstätten Gerät"  
(universal workshop device).

I happend to buy one some years ago, saving it from the junk yard. The 
people who owned it didn't know what a treasure they were to throw away. 
I added stepper motors and end switches to all axis and run the machine 
with home made software. As one of the first items I made (PC 
controlled) some 60 gear wheels for the machine itself from hydraulic 
piston steel slabs. The reason why I am participating in this list is my 
wish to run the machine with EMC2, but so far I didn't have the time 
(and the guts) to start this as a primary project.

Peter




Jon Elson schrieb:
> [email protected] wrote:
>   
>> I enjoy reading about y'all and your terrawatt spindle motors with bits that 
>> require a mobile crane to load but what about small
>> What if I wanted to make say watch parts
>> And I will qualify that by saying a watch for us normal size folks
>> And I am sure y'all with deep pockets can come up with links to all sorts of 
>> commercial equipment but what about us hobbiest
>> I realize small is not necessarily the best description because accuracy is 
>> the main requirement
>> Anyone ever built such a creature
>>   
>>     
> It shouldn't be very hard.  Making (or retrofitting) a small machine solves
> a couple accuracy/resolution problems just by reducing mass, thermal
> expansion, etc.  Tiny ballscrews are seen on eBay all the time.
>
> If you are talking about a lathe, you might look at a jewelers/watchmakers
> lathe.  There are several small milling machines that might make good
> candidates.
>
> On the other hand, I am sure I could build watch parts on my Bridgeport
> mill with no problem.
>
> Jon
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to