As someone with practical experience of trying to use cnc to 
make watch parts in my capacity as restorer and repairer of 
antique chronometers and complicated watches I can say that 
its usefulness is very limited. I built a small cnc mill 
with the express purpose of using it to help me make some of 
the parts I need to replace in the antique watches I work on 
but it has really seen comparatively little use for this 
purpose. I trained myself over the years to use the methods 
and tricks of the old time watchmakers from the time before 
electricity and modern materials and I honestly find these 
methods much quicker than trying to use cnc for one-off parts.

I have cut (gear) wheels down to less than 1/8" diameter 
with up to 20 teeth on the cnc machine (see album at 
https://picasaweb.google.com/114833214086356299537/WatchParts?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCJLN-tn5hPeEzwE&feat=directlink
   
- these wheels are sitting on a British 5 pence coin which 
is a little over 1/2 inch diameter) but, while the machine 
did the automatic dividing and cutting, I still had to make 
the means of holding the wheel blanks and the cutters etc. 
which took as long as if I had just cut them on the watch 
lathe with a simple division plate (2nd photo).

I originally thought that cnc would be an easy way of making 
some of the flat parts for the striking and repeating work 
on the watches but that proved to be a failure. Whilst I can 
draw or design the missing or broken parts in a CAD program 
- in Rhino, for example, I can use a photograph of the watch 
mechanism suitably scaled as a background and actually draw 
the new part as if it were in the watch (3rd photo), 
translating that into metal on the cnc machine is often 
impossible. Much of the 'flatwork' needs sharp internal 
corners such as in racks (several of the other photos) and 
this is impossible to produce with rotary tools such as 
endmills. The sizes involved are just too small to be able 
to find or make a small enough endmill which is also robust 
enough to cut tool steel (say 8 or 10 thou diameter). 
Consequently, any attempt to mill out the perimeter of such 
a part would end up as just a series of blunt indentations 
which would not even be good enough to give the accurate 
location of the working edges. The other big problem is in 
holding the work. The last 3 pictures show various staffs 
which I have had to make for watches. The little one which 
is less than the width of the pinhead (normal dressmaking 
pin) was for a wheel in the striking work of a small dress 
pocket watch from about 1728 - how would you hold that to 
machine it in a cnc machine? The next is a couple of 
cylinder watch balance staffs which are polished steel tubes 
with end plugs for the pivots and about 3/4 of the tube wall 
cut away at the opening. The last picture is rather a 
rarity, thank goodness, and is the balance staff from a very 
high class, French, 'ruby' cylinder watch dated about 1730 
although this 'ruby' is actually pale sapphire. The end 
pivots on this were badly bent and couldn't be repaired and 
so I had to make a complete new staff - it took many 
attempts over about 3 weeks before I got a good one!!! The 
staff is a hollow steel tube which is used as a cage to hold 
the 'working part' near the wheel which is a cylinder of 
sapphire about 1mm diameter and 0.7mm bore with almost half 
its diameter cut away and the cut edges polished to a 
defined profile. The original was cracked and it took a lot 
of thought, trial and error before I managed to find a way 
to make and polish a new one!! The bottom part of the staff 
is also cut away for about 80% of its diameter. So come on 
Jon, how would you make these on your Bridgeport ;-)

Having said that, if you are prepared to put in the hours 
necessary to design the parts, make the wheel cutters and 
the jigs necessary to hold the parts while they are being 
machined, you probably could make 70% of the parts for a 
very basic watch by cnc - they would still need hours of 
fitting and finishing and there would be parts that you just 
couldn't make but it would provide a lengthy distraction 
from other things and you would be able to make hundreds of 
the same parts.  For myself, I'll just carry on making the 
parts simply, by hand methods as, for one-offs, I know it is 
the quickest way..

In the watch industry now, most of the parts other than the 
main plates are made by wire erosion or by photo etching and 
the design of parts has been adjusted to suit these methods.

Best wishes,  Ian
_____________________
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield  UK



----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - 
www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1872 / Virus Database: 2092/4621 
- Release Date: 11/16/11


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to