On 20 April 2012 06:42, Scott Hasse <scott.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rather than trying to solve this problem in a million places not under our > control, doesn't it make sense to try and solve it properly in one place > and look more closely at using more than one line for look ahead?
As I said earlier, I don't think this is a "Lookahead" problem, it is a "must be able to stop inside the next code block" problem. And I am not convinced that being able to stop the machine within the next code block is necessarily a sensible requirement. -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
