On 24.02.13 02:23, andy pugh wrote: > That isn't the way it is meant to be. Bottom-posting (As you describe) > is even worse than top-posting (which I despise).
It is Full-quoting which can make Bottom-posting about as bad as top-posting, I think. (See sig) Reply paragraphs following N short _relevant_ quoted paragraphs will be Bottom-posting or In-line replies, depending on N. Editing is the key, but it can add quite a few seconds of extra thought. Erik -- A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of the discussion. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
