On 4 June 2013 08:23, propcoder <[email protected]> wrote:

> What reasons are for using hall sensors? As I understand, commutation
> goes from software, which means there is no difference between qi or qh
> modes in reaction time.

With Hall sensors the motor works at full torque at switch-on. With q
and qi modes it needs to perform an alignment process.

q is OK for a spindle, but can't be used reliable on an axis that is
under load. qi mode might be usable for an axis, if random movement
during the alignment is acceptable.

> I was planning to spin my 8-pole BLDC motors up to 3000rpm. This means
> 5ms every electric cycle. When using 1ms servo period, this may be not
> very nice.. What do you think? I think I will need to try smaller servo
> periods.

Hall commutation only changes state 6 times per electrical cycle, so
you will end up with something similar. If you can run a 500us servo
thread then that would be nicer.

> I thought all this hostmot2 and bldc on 5i23 + 7i39 commutates in
> hardware (I think this is possible). I am disappointed a bit.

It is possible, and there are drives out there that take hall signal
inputs and commutate in hardware. There are also AC servo drives that
take encoder inputs, but they tend to be a _lot_ more expensive than
the 7i39, and generally require a matched absolute encoder.

-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to