I mostly agree with Matt except I have found thought investment is usually
pretty portable.
Linuxcnc is fun and flexible. That is the only 'reason' needed. :)
On Jun 13, 2013 11:13 AM, "Matt Shaver" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:07:20 -0500
> Charles Steinkuehler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Why do you use LinuxCNC and what are the features you like best?
> <...>
> > Help me out with some "talking points"!  :)
>
> It's similar to the reason I use Linux (I guess, considering the reasons
> I'm about to give, I should say GNU/Linux, but it's just too awkward).
>
> There are technologies that I need in my life on a continuous basis.
> Each of these will have costs: Initial cost of acquisition is one (but
> not the largest over time), maintenance, upgrades as required, etc. The
> largest cost of all in any technology, is what I will call the "sunk
> cost of intellectual investment". This is not a money cost. This cost
> is the sum of all the learning and thinking you have done with respect
> to a particular technology. In CNC, that is no small amount of learning
> and thinking time, and once invested is mostly sunk, that is you can't
> recover your investment by disposing of the goods as surplus; Your
> excess thoughts aren't going to bring much on eBay. It is true that
> some of the learning and thinking you will do with any particular
> technological solution will port to another similar solution. For
> example, a general knowledge of g-code will help you on any control
> system you need to operate.
>
> To me, it's unwise to make any further investment of this type in a
> proprietary technology. I justify this out of my previous experiences
> with proprietary technologies I have used in the past from
> manufacturers including Microsoft, Bridgeport, Autodesk, Symantec, et
> al. What happens (and it _always_ happens at the worst possible time)
> is that the manufacturer will stop supporting their product by making
> repair parts unavailable, or stopping technical support, or raising the
> costs of either of these to a level intended to herd you towards their
> sales department. I don't mind spending the money, but I won't abide
> extortion. Using their proprietary technology means that at a time most
> inconvenient to you, you may have to scrap your intellectual investment
> with no hope of recovery AND THEN MAKE ANOTHER intellectual investment
> to get up and running with the replacement technology.
>
> Using free (libre) technologies in the key, critical parts of your life
> will at least allow you to manage the process of technological advance
> in a way that avoids crisis. Even if the free technology is an
> imperfect replacement for the proprietary technology, it is cheaper to
> add your own extensions to fill in the gaps, or learn to live with the
> current limitations of the free technology (don't worry, mechanisms are
> in place to keep free technology advancing and the deficiencies of
> today will be fixed tomorrow) than to risk the loss of your mental
> assets whenever it suits the schedule of the proprietary vendor.
>
> This is the only reason you need to use LinuxCNC.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to