On 12/11/2013 6:02 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
> 2013/12/11 Dave Cole <linuxcncro...@gmail.com>
>
>> If it meets your needs then you have succeeded. :-)
>>
>> I have put AC servos on Induction Hardening machines before.   The
>> machine you are using may be similar to the one I automated.   The
>> shaft/camshaft moves vertically through an energized induction coil and
>> is sprayed with water to create harden the surface. I put a high dollar
>> Parker servo on one years ago and the drive went crazy  when the
>> induction coils were energized.    We tried everything and ended up
>> putting in a much cheaper AC servo drive and the problems went away.
>> :-)    The induction coils induce voltage into everything that is near
>> the them, including cables, motors, etc.  The machine frame "ground"
>> varies in potential along the machine frame.
>>
>> Well in this machine the camshaft is stationary and turns on its own
> center to get a homogeneous heating. The coil and the shower move all the
> way to make the treatment. The carriage is heavy and also it's suspended
> because the ways are on one side, so this is what makes this mechanism more
> noisy and rough. I mean it's not a bad machine, but it's heavy and bulky
> for the job. I hope I don't have that problem of the induced voltage on the
> VFD, we'll see that in a few days when we turn on the heater.
>
>
>> If you have a similar machine, then .3-.4 mm of error is quite acceptable.
>>
> Yes indeed, I'm more than happy with this because I was affraid that tuning
> this could consume a lot of time but I can start to work now and improve
> the tuning everytime the machine is not working. The most important things
> are to reduce the vibration when the carriage moves up, and also find a way
> to reduce my following error when the joint accelerates because that's when
> I got the most critical following error, so If I set low values I got the
> problem, but if I set it high the machine works fine and I got those .3 or
> .4 mm of error wich is quite good. Remember that this machine worked with
> switches like limit switches and it had a big plate with the wedges (I
> don't know if wedges is ok). Anyway this was ok for the time but now I need
> to change the programs often and it's an obsolet sytem.
>
> Also, if you see the original motors for the positioning system you'll be
> crazy. The machine had a DC motor with a reductor for the precise movements
> when the part was being heated. And that motor also was feeded by a DC
> generator that was powered by another AC motor. This is only for the
> precise movements. When the part was finished, the coil returned to the
> home position by means of an AC motor. The machine switched between the DC
> motor and the AC motor using a electromagnetic clutch. That was a hell of
> KW wasted for a simple process, even for that year (1975) they could have
> used DC servos. Anyway, that's all gone now and I'm glad LinuxCNC is again
> making me happy with its result :).
>
>

It sounds like you are greatly simplifying the machine.   An MG set 
(motor generator set) is a very old technology to create DC power. That 
was probably obsolete when it was installed.

When the Parker Servo malfunctioned it was very obvious.   It had a 
digital display on the front to show status and it would go blank when 
the induction power was applied to the heating coils.  It was quite 
literally "lights out".    I thought that I had lost power to the drive 
due a wiring error or blow fuse.

Dave


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to