On Tuesday 25 February 2014 08:41:05 Viesturs Lācis did opine: > 2014-02-25 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Alexander Stewart <ivatt...@gmail.com>: > > Steve; > > > > Despite what those figures appear to show, Mach's output behaves > > better > > > > > than LinuxCNC's. It sounds much much smoother. I posted many moons > > > ago > > > > Does the TP work change that? Probably makes the old comparison > > invalid. > > It was in a video, taken some time ago - I have watched it and the > difference really was in favor for mach, but the latest test results > from Sam have proved that wrong and have made me willing to check for > myself. > > > Looking forward to running the newer code sometime in the nearish > > future. > > Same here, but I do not feel like a guy to build from source myself. Any > chance for buildbot deb package with the new TP code included? > > Viesturs
I too would be interested, although I have been on the 2.5.3 branch for a while now. Cheers, Gene -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> NOTICE: Will pay 100 USD for an HP-4815A defective but complete probe assembly. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
