On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Viesturs Lācis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Current 3D model looks like this: > http://picpaste.com/model-XeiYl0y4.PNG > > I do not really agree that cutting both sides at once is more complicated. > Having 2 jointers and then feeder system for both of them and also some > mechanism, which would rebase boards from one side to another between > jointers - that seems too complicated for me. One advantage of cutting both sides is that it guarantees the parallellism of both sides even if the input board is not quite rectangular. If the boards can be assumed to have parallel sides, how about two fences on the entrance, one fixed and one attached to the movable spindle. The movable fence is driven by a weak stepper or even a spring, and the cycle consists of retracting the movable fence, and starting it back when the entering board is detected. When the fence makes the contact with the board, it stalls; the board is processed and when it leaves the machine the cycle restarts. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
