2014-05-28 21:11 GMT-03:00 andy pugh <[email protected]>:
> Ah, yes, that old problem. That should have been the first thing I
> thought of, I have been bitten by the same thing enough times.
> In fact "comp" probably ought enforce the component and file names
> being the same.
>
I sure going to remember that from now on :).
By the way Andy, since you've been working with these kind of approach. I'm
planning to measure the lobe using an edge kind of follower. I'm attaching
a picture of the idea.
My question is, if I can sense the linear movement with an LVDT with an
accuracy of 0.001 mm for 0.1° of turn for the lobe, I have a difference in
the contact point when I try to calculet it. The difference is no more than
0.04 mm in the offset that I have to apply. Do you think this is going to
be a problem? Also I think I have some differences in the way C language is
making the calculations. I get a little difference when I do it on the
calculator by hand.
Anyway, consider that now I'm using steel master cams to reproduce the
lobes, and I doubt I can handle that accuracy now.
I hope I'm clear about what I'm trying to explain, if not please let me
know!
Thank you!
Leonardo.
--
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
www.restlet.com/download
http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
