On 18 Aug 2014, at 19:42, David Armstrong wrote: > a vacuum would be far better and safer , instead of blowing potential chips > into someones eyes etc > no matter how good you are at trying to keep small debris in check , > particles always get through . >
I agree. I have seen several very nice cameras (and rather expensive) destroyed by dust and small particles being blown into the autofocus mechanism. Marcus > viesturs > let me know what you need from opencv into linuxcnc etc > > Dave > > > On 18 August 2014 19:16, TJoseph Powderly <tjt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> maybe vacuum is better >> ( dont blow chips into already cleaned pocket) >> maybe mechanical fingers could detect pockets simply >> imagine a row across conveyer of pivoting fingers drooping down to belt >> as wood passes it would raise lever finger to hi posn >> if it returned NOT to conveyer level , you got a pocket >> might be able to trigger multiple vacuums at once, >> a vacuum cleaner brush type nozzle behind each finger sensor >> _ _ _ _ _ _ >> \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` ` ` \ \ \ >> x x x x x x x x x x x x x O O O x x x x x x >> >> --------------------------POCKET ------------ >> >> fwiw >> tomp >> tjtr33 >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Emc-users mailing list >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
