On 5/22/2015 8:32 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 22 May 2015 at 13:21, Stuart Stevenson <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you add an index to the spindle then you might as well add an encoder to >> the spindle. That would solve the rigid tapping problem. I would rather go this route, but there is zero room to add any of the above, in the spindle carrier itself.
> I am not convinced that there is a rigid-tapping problem. > > I believe that the cycle uses the index at most once per in-out move, > so as long as you are not peck-tapping it will still work. > That makes sense, We don't really do rigid tapping in house, yet, but I want all options available on this bad boy, so the peck-tap isn't a big deal, if it comes to that, then I will need to get real creative with an encoder on the spindle itself. -- Thanks Rick Lair Superior Roll & Turning LLC 399 East Center Street Petersburg MI, 49270 PH: 734-279-1831 FAX: 734-279-1166 www.superiorroll.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
