On 2016-05-24 17:05, andy pugh wrote: > I don't see it as cronyism, I see it as both sides of the conversation > being baffled about the motivations of the other. Show me where, please. I have requested for a first short review. Not more or no less.
> Maybe there is a misunderstanding about hwat happens to code that is > submitted? It doesn't get "adopted" and maintained by a core team of > developers, there is no such team. Yes there is. Who manages the build process, configuration managment aso. ? There are just few people who being versed with hostmot2 lowlevel programming. I'd say less then one hand full. > In that conversation Jepler seems to be explaining what it would take > to keep the driver working in future releases of LinuxCNC. That seems > reasonable to me. No, he urged a totaly obvious fact which is explicit mentioned in the posted source link. And you can also assume the basic mood here and indicates the direction of the journey : http://tom-itx.no-ip.biz:81/~tom-itx/irc/logs/%23linuxcnc-devel/2016-05-21.html#16:36:51 And Dave has right. If they just said no it would be better. -- "In der Wissenschaft siegt nie eine neue Theorie, nur ihre Gegner sterben nach und nach" Max Planck ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
