On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:55 AM Sam Sokolik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Each tool has 15 rings that can be 'present' or not.  So when I tool is
> called - the chain just runs around until it finds the right number...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nuRea6615s
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:52 AM Sam Sokolik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No - because each tool has a mechanical barcode on it...   Wait - doesn't
>> everyone have barcoded tools?  Come now!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:50 AM John Dammeyer <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> But the tools move around so the system has to keep track of where they
>>> are.
>>> Nice video.  Thanks for posting that.
>>>
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Sam Sokolik [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> > Sent: January-07-19 9:00 AM
>>> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>>> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
>>> >
>>> > That is our machine...  The we just call the next tool after the
>>> previous
>>> > tool change..  (too easy?)  So the tool is ready before the next op..
>>> (as
>>> > long as the operation isn't too long..)
>>> >
>>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39q6kvrSBSk&t=2s
>>> >
>>> > sam
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Jon Elson <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On 01/06/2019 11:29 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
>>> > > > Excuse my ignorance.  The G Code selects a tool by #.  The operator
>>> has
>>> > > placed the tools into the numbered positions for the tool changer.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Now here I guess it gets interesting.  Most efficient would be if
>>> the
>>> > > G-Code Parser read ahead and signaled the tool changer object that it
>>> will
>>> > > need tool # Y next.  The tool changer moves and loads the tool into
>>> the
>>> > > other side of the swing arm.  The carousel then moves back to the
>>> position
>>> > > X which is the tool currently in use.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Am I missing something?
>>> > > >
>>> > > Yes, the G-code definition is that the PROGRAMMER calls for
>>> > > the next tool to be prepped by placing a T## command where
>>> > > he decides it should be.  The problem with read ahead is,
>>> > > how FAR do you read ahead looking for the T## command?  It
>>> > > might be a LONG way down the file.
>>> > > LinuxCNC just conforms to the way a bunch of other systems
>>> > > define it.
>>> > >
>>> > > Jon
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Emc-users mailing list
>>> > > [email protected]
>>> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Emc-users mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>
>>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to