Any rack you make, even if machined perfectly will have some backlash.   It
is unavoidable.    Belts have zero backlash if you use the belt the way it
was designed -- the belt moves

If you want to use a belt, contact the sale engineers at
https://www.sdp-si.com/ or at least read the technical article on their web
site.  They have a lot of good engineering advice and real data  SDP/SI is
*the* place to buy this kind of stuff.

If I were building this I'd use either V-track or round rails.   Chips can
not build up on a V or a round.  Then pull the carage with a long belt.  IF
you do you calculatins right (or ask for help) belt streach is a
none-issue.

But does it matter?   Maybe for wood cutting a 1mm tolerance is OK?



On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 8:08 AM Leonardo Marsaglia <[email protected]>
wrote:

> >
> > Cutting your own racks, while doable is a heck of lot of work for the
> > lengths you are talking about, even if you make it in short sections. If
> > your time is worth even a fraction of minimum wage you would be better
> > off using off the shelf rack and pinions.
>
>
> I know it sounds like a pain in the ass but I can get some really nice and
> squared 6061 aluminum profiles to make the racks. And I'm planning to mount
> them on the turret of the Mazak and use a fly cutter on a shaft between
> centers to machine the racks in a serial way. That way I can make them in a
> easy way. I already have the jig to mount them so it's only a matter of
> program the job and start to cut. I need to make some holes and registers
> to mount the racks but still I think it's not that big deal.
>
> It's just that gluing the belt sounds cheap and/or not at all a secure
> option for me. But it's just the way I see it.
>
> El sáb., 27 abr. 2019 a las 12:01, Leonardo Marsaglia (<
> [email protected]>) escribió:
>
> > With any rack or rack-like drive a gantry can have zero racking problems
> >> by connecting the drive on both sides with a shaft.
> >
> >
> > Gregg, sounds you don't trust too much on having two motors driving the
> > gantry. I've seen too many machines working this way but I would like to
> > hear your opinion about that matter. I have zero experience with gantries
> > so I like to hear all the opinions. I have to say I do like more the two
> > motors approach but I would like to know what do you think about it.
> >
> > El mié., 24 abr. 2019 a las 11:16, Les Newell (<
> [email protected]>)
> > escribió:
> >
> >>
> >> > 10m, 35mm width T5 for $60
> >> >
> >>
> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/10Meters-T5-open-ended-timing-belt-T5-30-W-30mm-T5-timing-belt-polyurethane-with-steel/2051875939.html
> >>
> >>
> >> That's a good price. Two of those would do both sides of a 4M machine.
> >> That is steel cored which is stiffer than Kevlar. Pity one reel isn't
> >> quite enough to do a 2.4m machine. Of course it would be enough for a
> >> 'tank track' style mechanism. Must...resist...temptation...
> >>
> >> Les
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to